OK, so now we have a  counterpoint to "The Long Tail" from a few years ago.  While I read and bought in to the premise that the Internet was helping to free everyone to explore and engage with the vast catalogs available thanks to digital distribution we now have a new report to consider.

Anita Elberse analyzed data for music downloads and movie rentals and showed that while the long tail was indeed getting longer it wasn’t really getting fatter.  In fact her analysis showed that the blockbusters were holding or gaining in their share.

Point: In 2006, "The Long Tail" made a splash arguing that the Internet, with its expansive shelf space, would mean a smaller role for mega-hit products and a bigger one for also-rans.

Counterpoint: Now, a Harvard professor has published a study suggesting the Web is only cementing the prominence of a small number of cultural favorites.

At Issue: The basics of consumer behavior. Do we want infinite choice, or do we prefer to pick up on the likes and dislikes of others in forming our own tastes?

Chris Anderson has already responded on his blog and still sees a difference despite agreeing with her numbers.  Basically he feels it comes down to how you define the "head" and "tail".

My take is that while the tail is getting longer I see the whole graph getting deeper thanks to the Internet, so you can look at it two ways.  The blockbuster hits get even more now with digital distribution but so does the tail as everyone is now able to uncover media that otherwise wouldn’t be found.  While we may not have changed any paradigms with the Internet we have definitely made consumption easier.

Study Refutes Niche Theory Spawned by Web

 

Nice to see Craig speak about his Election thoughts and promote the CNN iReport site.

I just noticed that our embedded player doesn’t give you any path back to the site, maybe something we want to take a look at.

cnewmark: Okay, I try the CNN iReport thing

 

ph_125[1]Just found this cool site with lots of tips, or ‘hacks’, from the true experts – parents.

Parent Hacks is a collaborative website that collects and publishes parents’ tips, recommendations, workarounds, and bits of wisdom – their hacks – in a single pot so we can all partake. Here’s the stuff that would have been left out of the instruction manual…if there were one. We’re not experts in the pediatrician-, psychologist-, or teacher- sense. We’re just out there, raising our kids, finding the little tweaks that make this crazy adventure go a little more smoothly.

They have tons of practical advice and I found myself making mental notes on several of the entries that applied to my life as a parent.  Nice mention that they were inspired by the series or hack books from O’Reilly.

Another feed added in to Google Reader.

 

It looks like this started back in 2003, but a few times a year I come across it and chuckle.

I cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdgnieg.The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid Aoccdrnig to rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn’t mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe.

More on the meme at snopes.com

 

I enjoy a joke as well as anyone but April Fools can be frustrating when you consume so much data from so many sources.

On most days I can scan the feeds and get a good idea on what is happening, but today I have to read everything closely and to the end to make sure it isn’t a joke. Most are obvious but I have already had a few that seemed reasonable enough that I had to read them to look for signs or confessions of a prank.

 

Matt has a screencast here that shows off some of the new design and features.  It looks good and I hope the plugin developers are busy checking their code and getting them ready.

© 2011 gregtyree.com Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha